Double the impact, half the time:

WITH AI

How we cut +50% of the time spent on creative production for Storybeat.

Storybeat

INTRODUCTION

Revolutionizing advertising by integrating AI into Storybeat’s creative process. This case study delves into their journey towards dramatically reducing production times and costs while enhancing ad effectiveness. By optimizing and refining ads through AI solutions, we sat a new standard in efficiency and performance.

THE CHALLENGE

Revolutionizing Ad Production

There was a need for rapid production without sacrificing the ad’s impact. We faced a bottleneck with traditional content creation methods — being slow and costly.

THE SOLUTION

We saw an opportunity to make a radical shift to AI-driven solutions to overcome these hurdles

Our focus was on refining and iterating the best-performing ads rather than creating new concepts from scratch. This strategy understands the iterative nature of ad optimization.

Partnering with an agency that took the initiative to experiment with AI in content creation has been pivotal for us at Storybeat, especially when creative design can be a bottleneck for small teams. This agile experimentation has not only enhanced our creative processes but also provided deeper insights into what resonates with our audience. At Storybeat, we are committed to continuous improvement and applying growth methodologies where constant iteration is key. It’s invaluable to have a partner that shares this mindset and helps optimize our outcomes

– Michelle Murcia, Head of Growth @ Storybeat

THE PROCESS

AI: The New Creative Partner
Admiral Media’s strategy was to infuse AI into every step of the creative process, from translation to testing.

AI Translations and Efficiency

AI was leveraged to automate the translation process, drastically reducing the time from script to screen and ensuring message consistency across different markets.

Creative Testing Accelerated

We deployed AI to test a variety of ad formats, analyzing performance metrics to quickly determine the most effective variations.

The AI Advantage

Immediate translations and faster image sourcing were just the beginning. AI allowed us to create more ad variations faster, testing them in real-time to optimize performance.

The winning version featured an iteration that included more people and drone shots of the island. Finding the right images for the original version took approximately 120 minutes. In contrast, prompting Midjourney to generate the exact desired images and animating them with Runway took less than 40 minutes.

Storybeat AI Generated Creative Iterations

THE RESULTS

The integration of AI into the creative process had compelling results in cost and time efficiency.

This led to significant cost savings, enabling more ad variations within the same budget and timeframe.

In some cases, due to the evolution of Generative AI tools, the final outcome might not be perfect. Nevertheless, the technology holds great potential and is already beneficial to the creatives testing process.

Time Savings Summary

Our AI integration for Storybeat resulted in significant time savings across various production aspects:

Note: The table assumes a 50% time saving on simpler tasks and up to 80% on more complex tasks with AI, such as including an AI avatar instead of a creator to present the app.

Click on task type to read description.

Task type

Simple hook iterations

Simple hook iterations

Manual production time includes all variations that are usually dismissed in the copywriting polishing process. For AI generated headlines the deliverables contemplate human revision times, otherwise the deliverables number would be higher, probably at lower quality.

Polished Subtitles

Polished Subtitles

Subtitles translation and manual adding vs. Using AI tools that translate, add automated captions, and allow customization of the subtitle style.

Footage Research

Footage Research

Appropriate and matching footage research vs. AI generated images with Midjourney and Animated with Runway.

Translation

Translation

Manual translations by Native speakers vs. 99% accurate translations made with ChatGPT.

UGC style footage

UGC style footage

Obtaining videos from creators can take days including production time on their end and feedback back and forth .

Average Manual
Production Time

1 hour

0.75 hours

2 hours

10 min.

3 hours net

Deliverables by average
manual production time

25 hooks

Single 20 secs. ads

10 relevant videos

Single 15 secs. script

1 to 3 videos

AI tools approximate
Deliverables in the same
time

150 hooks

Three 20 secs. ads

18 relevant and
custom videos

Ten 15 secs. scripts

20 videos / 10 min each

Task type

Simple hook iterations

Simple hook iterations

Manual production time includes all variations that are usually dismissed in the copywriting polishing process. For AI generated headlines the deliverables contemplate human revision times, otherwise the deliverables number would be higher, probably at lower quality.

Polished Subtitles

Polished Subtitles

Subtitles translation and manual adding vs. Using AI tools that translate, add automated captions, and allow customization of the subtitle style.

Footage Research

Footage Research

Appropriate and matching footage research vs. AI generated images with Midjourney and Animated with Runway.

Translation

Translation

Manual translations by Native speakers vs. 99% accurate translations made with ChatGPT.

UGC style footage

UGC style footage

Obtaining videos from creators can take days including production time on their end and feedback back and forth .

Average Manual
Production Time

1 hour

0.75 hours

2 hours

10 min.

3 hours net

Task type

Simple hook iterations

Simple hook iterations

Manual production time includes all variations that are usually dismissed in the copywriting polishing process. For AI generated headlines the deliverables contemplate human revision times, otherwise the deliverables number would be higher, probably at lower quality.

Polished Subtitles

Polished Subtitles

Subtitles translation and manual adding vs. Using AI tools that translate, add automated captions, and allow customization of the subtitle style.

Footage Research

Footage Research

Appropriate and matching footage research vs. AI generated images with Midjourney and Animated with Runway.

Translation

Translation

Manual translations by Native speakers vs. 99% accurate translations made with ChatGPT.

UGC style footage

UGC style footage

Obtaining videos from creators can take days including production time on their end and feedback back and forth .

Deliverables by average
manual production time

25 hooks

Single 20 secs. ads

10 relevant videos

Single 15 secs. script

1 to 3 videos

Task type

Simple hook iterations

Simple hook iterations

Manual production time includes all variations that are usually dismissed in the copywriting polishing process. For AI generated headlines the deliverables contemplate human revision times, otherwise the deliverables number would be higher, probably at lower quality.

Polished Subtitles

Polished Subtitles

Subtitles translation and manual adding vs. Using AI tools that translate, add automated captions, and allow customization of the subtitle style.

Footage Research

Footage Research

Appropriate and matching footage research vs. AI generated images with Midjourney and Animated with Runway.

Translation

Translation

Manual translations by Native speakers vs. 99% accurate translations made with ChatGPT.

UGC style footage

UGC style footage

Obtaining videos from creators can take days including production time on their end and feedback back and forth .

AI tools approximate
Deliverables in the same
time

150 hooks

Three 20 secs. ads

18 relevant and
custom videos

Ten 15 secs. scripts

20 videos / 10 min each

THE INSIGHTS

Learning from AI’s Impact
Our analysis uncovered key factors that contributed to the success of AI-enhanced ads.

Enhanced Elements

Strategic use of voice-overs and select imagery provided by AI resonated more with audiences, as reflected in the enhanced performance metrics.

  • Transitioned from a “robotic AI” voice to a more human tone. Challenging the effectiveness of the then trendy style, testing different voice overs in ads through multivariable tests.
  • Shifted from realistic, softly-toned images (classic user generated footage) to more vibrant colors in reels, uncovering surprising audience preferences and challenging initial assumptions.

Valuable Lessons

  • It became evident that the addition or removal of specific elements could dramatically influence viewer engagement and ad performance. This enables a more efficient testing of variations to identify winning combinations faster.
  • We need to take into account that the time varies according to the results of generative AI exercises and the tools evolution. As Generative AI tools improve, more polished results can be obtained in less time. But AI is not quite there yet. 

The context here is critical: this wasn’t about initial creative conception; it’s about optimizing what already works to avoid creative fatigue. By utilizing AI, we would streamline production making it possible to deliver tailored content that manual processes would struggle to match within the same time frame.

-Deb Paladino, Creative Lead at Admiral Media

CONCLUSION:

The AI Edge in Creative Advertising

Through this partnership, Admiral Media demonstrated that AI can be a game-changer in the world of advertising. Storybeat’s case is a testament to how AI can be utilized not just for efficiency but for crafting more resonant and effective ads. 

This case study not only showcases our agency’s AI-expertise but also serves as a valuable resource for those seeking insights on how to successfully leverage AI in today’s User Acquisition world and the dynamic industry of mobile app advertising.